Apple’s iOS operating system is generally considered secure, certainly enough for most users most of the time. But in recent years hackers have successfully found a number of flaws that provide entry points into iPhones and iPads. Many of these have been what are called zero-click or interactionless attacks that can infect a device without the victim so much as clicking a link or downloading a malware-laced file. Time and again these weaponized vulnerabilities turned out to be in Apple’s chat app, iMessage. But now it appears that Apple has had enough. New research shows that the company took iMessage’s defenses to a whole other level with the release of iOS 14 in September.
At the end of December, for example, researchers from the University of Torontoâ€™s Citizen Lab published findings on a hacking campaign from the summer in which attackersÂ successfully targeted dozens of Al Jazeera journalists with a zero-click iMessages attack to install NSO Group’s notorious Pegasus spyware. Citizen Lab said at the time that it didn’t believe iOS 14 was vulnerable to the hacking used in the campaign; all the victims were running iOS 13, which was current at the time.
Samuel GroÃŸ has long investigated zero-click iPhone attacks alongside a number of his colleagues at Google’s Project Zero bug-hunting team. The week, he detailed three improvements that Apple added to iMessage to harden the system and make it much more difficult for attackers to send malicious messages crafted to wreak strategic havoc.
â€œThese changes are probably very close to the best that couldâ€™ve been done given the need for backward compatibility, and they should have a significant impact on the security of iMessage and the platform as a whole,â€� GroÃŸ wrote on Thursday. â€œItâ€™s great to see Apple putting aside the resources for these kinds of large refactorings to improve end usersâ€™ security.â€�
In response to Citizen Lab’s research, Apple said in December that â€œiOS 14 is a major leap forward in security and delivered new protections against these kinds of attacks.â€�
iMessage is an obvious target for zero-click attacks for two reasons. First, it’s a communication system, meaning part of its function is to exchange data with other devices. iMessage is literally built for interactionless activity; you don’t need to tap anything to receive a text or photo from a contact. And iMessage’s full suite of featuresâ€”integrations with other apps, payment functionality, even small things like stickers and memojiâ€”make it fertile ground for hackers as well. All those interconnections and options are convenient for users but add â€œattack surface,â€� or potential for weakness.
â€œiMessage is a built-in service on every iPhone, so itâ€™s a huge target for sophisticatedÂ hackers,â€� says Johns Hopkins cryptographer Matthew Green. â€œIt also has a ton of bells and whistles, and every single one of those features is a new opportunity for hackers to find bugs that let them take control of yourÂ phone. So what this research shows is that Apple knows this and has been quietly hardening the system.â€�
GroÃŸ outlines three new protections Apple developed to deal with its iMessage security issues at a structural level, rather than through Band-Aid patches. The first improvement, dubbed BlastDoor, is a â€œsandbox,â€� essentially a quarantine zone where iMessage can inspect incoming communications for potentially malicious attributes before releasing them into the main iOS environment.Â
The second new mechanism monitors for attacks that manipulate a shared cache of system libraries. The cache changes addresses within the system at random to make it harder to access maliciously. iOS only changes the address of the shared cache after a reboot, though, which has given zero-click attackers an opportunity to discover its location; it’s like taking shots in the dark until you hit something. The new protection is set up to detect malicious activity and trigger a refresh without the user having to restart their iPhone.
The post Apple Fixes One of the iPhone’s Most Pressing Security Risks appeared first on TechFans.